Page 52 of 145 FirstFirst ... 24248495051525354555662102 ... LastLast
Results 511 to 520 of 1443

Thread: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles

  1. #511
    Stuck on the Border
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    24,191

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by YoungEaglesFan View Post
    I’m afraid that my question got turned into something. I was asking had Glenn approved of them continuing with Deacon, how would you feel. I think you said that has been answered and I am sorry for being repetitive. My goal on here is to have a deeper understanding of your opinions so that i can understand your sentiment. Feel free to not answer it all you want. Many have said they don’t care for me asking the question and although I’m dissapointed by that, this is your thread not mine and I have to respect that
    For the umpteenth time,NO, I would not agree with it had Glenn approved of them continuing with Deacon.

    Soda said;

    It's not the Eagles without Glenn Frey.

    How many more times does this have to be repeated before the 3.0 crowd understand it? It is not difficult.

    Oh, and as for the 'fantasy world' stuff... please. I live in the real world where I have rejected this. In my view it is the surviving band members & their supporters who are dealing in fantasy.

    If people are going to use such language, I don't see why I shouldn't.

    As for moving on, I have wanted to move on for a long time. All I have wanted was for my objections to be respected, not agreed with.

  2. #512

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Freypower View Post
    For the umpteenth time,NO, I would not agree with it had Glenn approved of them continuing with Deacon.

    Soda said;

    It's not the Eagles without Glenn Frey.

    How many more times does this have to be repeated before the 3.0 crowd understand it? It is not difficult.

    Oh, and as for the 'fantasy world' stuff... please. I live in the real world where I have rejected this. In my view it is the surviving band members & their supporters who are dealing in fantasy.

    If people are going to use such language, I don't see why I shouldn't.
    Freypower I apologize for repeating a previous point. I have not personally seen it mentioned but you say you have and I know you are honest. I wish you and the people who reject the current lineup peace and a place to talk. I will keep myself out of the thread

  3. #513
    Stuck on the Border
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,948

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    If the questions asked from us who don't like the current band are genuine - to gain a "deeper understanding" - why are my replies always ignored? Am I not aggressive enough? Is it too hard to get into a fight with me?

    (Sorry, I used the wrong verb, to "address" a question, earlier. I fixed it. Gotta work on my English.)

    EDIT:

    I notice we're moving into a more peaceful direction in this thread for a change. That's nice.
    Last edited by chaim; 12-17-2017 at 11:36 PM.

  4. #514
    Stuck on the Border
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    2,211

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by chaim View Post
    If the questions asked from us who don't like the current band are genuine - to gain a "deeper understanding" - why are my replies always ignored? Am I not aggressive enough? Is it too hard to get into a fight with me?

    (Sorry, I used the wrong verb, to "address" a question, earlier. It means the opposite to asking a question. I fixed it. Gotta work on my English.)

    EDIT:

    I notice we're moving into a more peaceful direction in this thread for a change. That's nice.
    Chaim - You are always so diplomatic.

  5. #515
    Stuck on the Border
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,948

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by New Kid In Town View Post
    Chaim - You are always so diplomatic.
    But sometimes a bit passive aggressive perhaps. I do notice it.

  6. #516

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by chaim View Post
    If the questions asked from us who don't like the current band are genuine - to gain a "deeper understanding" - why are my replies always ignored? Am I not aggressive enough? Is it too hard to get into a fight with me?

    (Sorry, I used the wrong verb, to "address" a question, earlier. I fixed it. Gotta work on my English.)

    EDIT:

    I notice we're moving into a more peaceful direction in this thread for a change. That's nice.
    Chaim- I couldn’t find your response to my question. I found your comment talking about how you don’t care what the lineup does. For my question I didn’t plan on responding unless I felt it was necessary to address something. I appreciate your input and I am glad we have a healthy middle ground on here

  7. #517
    Stuck on the Border
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    24,191

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    OK, well I am sorry I sounded so annoyed above. I feel there are only so many times the same question can be answered. I have this to say:

    How I wish, how I wish you were here
    We're just two lost souls swimming in a fishbowl
    Year after year
    Running over the same old ground
    What have we found?
    The same old fears
    Wish you were here

    And that is where I now intend to leave it.

  8. #518
    Stuck on the Border Dawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Walking in Memphis ...
    Posts
    1,663

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by chaim View Post
    Maybe slightly more ok with this happening, but I still wouldn't personally think of the band as "Eagles". And musically I'd still have zero interest. I'm not sure about the first thing I said ("this happening"), but I'm sure about the other two (band name/interest musically).
    Your response to YEF's question. Right there in plain view.

    YEF asked the question but now states there was no real intent/plan to respond unless something needed to be addressed?

    I would laugh at the pure absurdity ...
    Last edited by Dawn; 12-18-2017 at 08:11 AM.


    "Let's burn our long johns and head west" - Glenn Frey 1948-2016

  9. #519
    Stuck on the Border
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    2,211

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Truthfully, I don't know how many more times we have to keep saying the Eagles are not the Eagles without Glenn Frey. And, we would feel the same way if it were Don who passed instead of Glenn. However, I firmly believe Glenn would never had re-grouped and retired the band gracefully.

  10. #520

    Default Re: Eagles.... 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawn View Post
    Your response to YEF's question. Right there in plain view.

    YEF asked the question but now states there was no real intent/plan to respond unless something needed to be addressed?

    I would laugh at the pure absurdity ...
    I am dissapointed that you felt you needed to post this. It’s borderline antagonizing and I made every attempt to apologize and leave. I’m not sure why this was necessary. I would not have responded to the answer to my question unless I had a question or they brought something different up. I just didn’t think it was necessary unless something new was added. I was asking for your opinion. I don’t see the need for a response but apparently it’s worth laughing at.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •