Originally Posted by
chaim
The brother comparison wasn't intented to refer to quality. I can't say who's better. I was thinking of attitudes. I love both Glenn and Don (Glenn a bit more, of course), but when I listen to the album, Don sounds like a young guy (little brother) who thinks he can make the world better by bashing everything. And Glenn sounds like an older guy (big brother) who cares about the world as much as his little brother ("Be part of something good. Leave something good behind"), but knows that expressing anger and bashing doesn't necessarily help. So he sounds calmer and more mature. Or something like that.
Now, I think it's ok when Don sings "we" ("We keep makin' the same mistakes over and over and over and over again"). While I get the point in "They think they know it all. They don't know much of nothing", I'm not a huge fan of lyrics that bash them or you ("You don't have the slightest notion what long-term love is all about"). Although I find the "eternal questions like...." bit very funny and essentially very true. I just don't like the "you" bit.
And, yes, I believe that lyrics like "You're not alone" can be more effective. Lyrics like "never thought I'd see you smile again" or "...that I will always be your friend" don't take much background research, but they say a lot. That's what gives you strentgh IMO - that you know you're not alone - not the fact that someone tells you your local newspaper lies. I think both things are good actually, but if it was just "everything is so bad", it would be very dull.
Having said that, I don't mind Don's rants in small doses, and musically I like them like I said, but IMO it could be torture without the songs I've mentioned or Glenn's instrumental.
Incidentally, I also feel that Gene Simmons is the big brother and Paul Stanley the little brother, but for totally different reasons!