Since our guys, and specifically Don, seem to be very proactive at protecting their copyrights, I thought most of us might find this interesting. It's an article about a recent lawsuit. The thrust of the article seems to be that besides the songs not being similar, the lack of detail on the judgment leaves a precedent of being able to copyright a "vibe".
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...rdict/?hpid=z4