NKIT: Sorry for not mistaking the view on Deacon here i assumed that the view was that the new additions were both not accepted as they were replacing Glenn. I am not saying that Gill or Deacon are better singers but what i'm saying in terms of harmony they have more to work with now and on paper they should be better. I am saying within the last 7 years or so. Im aware Felder didn't sing much harmony outside of like minor parts in HC, LE, TIE, and SBR. But the band featured a lineup that was more that was more different than the same. Vocally it was different. The harmonies had a different quality. Im just saying that at this stage of the band's history it doesn't matter much. It won't effect the legacy of the band which is all that matters. They weren't working on any new albums and nothing from LROOE was in the newer concerts. The work from "Eagles" to HFO defined the band. They were in their swan song and all that matters is playing good music from their history. Gill did what i consider a decent job. He obviously isn't a perfect fit for replacing Glenn and Deacon should sing more. One last point on Deacon, if it's just Vince Gill that everyone holds a grudge against, would everyone be ok if Deacon replaced all his Dad's work?