Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Madonna

  1. #11
    Moderator Brooke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Down some endless road just south of nowhere (Missouri)
    Posts
    21,495

    Default Re: Madonna

    I agree too. If I'm paying to see them, they better be singing live.

    I give a pass for the Superbowl too, although, I would be disappointed if Paul McCartney or Tom Petty, or any rock star lip synced. Even if the sound is terrible.

    I guess we are talking about two different types of entertainment acts here. Those that feel they must dance around and put on a big production and those who entertain by "just" singing and playing their instruments. I prefer the latter over all.
    https://i.imgur.com/CuSdAQM.jpg
    "They will never forget you 'till somebody new comes along"
    1948-2016 Gone but not forgotten

  2. #12
    Administrator sodascouts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Where Faulkner collides with Elvis
    Posts
    33,663

    Default Re: Madonna

    Yeah. If I want to see a dance review, I'll go to Vegas. Give me a real concert!

    Always in our hearts, Never forgotten

  3. #13
    Stuck on the Border Topkat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    3,321

    Default Re: Madonna

    I guess we are talking about two different types of entertainment acts here. Those that feel they must dance around and put on a big production and those who entertain by "just" singing and playing their instruments. I prefer the latter over all.
    _________________
    _

    Yes, you're right, but people like J Lo, Rhianna, & Madonna are supposed to be singers. They should be singing.They can put on a big production & still sing, if they let the dancers do the dancing. They should be singing. I would never see these shows anyway, so to me it's a mood point, but if people are paying for a singer, they should get a singer. Dance shows have become the norm for a lot of these performers. Give me a concert any day. I don't need to see a bunch of dancers. It's just distracting IMO.
    The Superbowl is really just the one exception, but I would still rather have a live singer.

  4. #14
    Stuck on the Border EagleLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    In The Hotel California
    Posts
    5,016

    Default Re: Madonna

    To me, Singers dancing is good IMO. It shows that they Not only Can Sing but can choreograph their own moves. IMO

  5. #15
    Stuck on the Border Topkat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    3,321

    Default Re: Madonna

    To me, Singers dancing is good IMO. It shows that they Not only Can Sing but can choreograph their own moves. IMO
    EL; So would you rather they dance & lip sync, because that's what they are doing? More than likely they do not choreograph the moves, they have a choreographer who does that. When they are doing a high energy dance, you can bet that they aren't singing, it's a recording.

  6. #16
    Moderator Ive always been a dreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Cruising down the center of a two-way street in VA
    Posts
    20,201

    Default Re: Madonna

    I totally agree that I absolutely don't want to go to a live concert to hear a singer lip sync!

    But I also give a big pass on the Super Bowl Halftime show, particularly considering the way the sound has sucked so hard in some of the past shows. It is supposed to be a 10 - 15 minute live show for sheer entertainment. And to me, Madonna's show was very entertaining. I loved the way it was choreographed - especially Vogue.

    "People don't run out of dreams: People just run out of time ..."
    Glenn Frey 11/06/1948 - 01/18/2016

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •