OK, here's the segment of the brief where Don disavows the label "liberal" for those who couldn't see the images:"In his declaration, DeVore asserts that Henley is a “poster boy[]” for, and “proudly a member” of, the “liberal, entertainment elite”; that he is one of “a group of celebrities associated in the public eye with Ms. Boxer, Mr. Obama and other prominent liberal politicians”; that he has “vocally supported” and is “publicly identified” with Boxer and the other politicians and policies attacked in Defendants’ videos; that Henley “fought . . . hard” to get Obama elected; that he was reportedly “booed” in Orange County for making “liberal political statements”; and that he is supportive of efforts by Boxer and others to “insert[] themselves into the American economy and enrich[] the government and certain special interests.” (DeVore Decl. ¶¶ 2-3, 6, 9-10.)
Even if this litany of Henley’s alleged “liberalism” were somehow relevant to the question of parody (which it is not), it is contradicted by the record in this case: Henley testified that he does not consider himself a “liberal”; there is not a shred of evidence of any “vocal support” by Henley for Obama or Boxer, or for any particular policies of theirs; Henley has never campaigned for Obama or Boxer; Defendants’ assertions concerning the “booing” incident are inaccurate; and the only public statement attributable to Henley concerning a politician in the record is a statement that was supportive of Republican Senator John McCain. (Henley Decl. ¶ 22; Henley Supp. Decl. ¶¶ 3-6, 8-9; Charlesworth Supp. Decl., Ex. 1 at 5-7 (Henley Dep. at 59:2-24, 61:2-62:2).)
[...]
Defendants make much of the fact that Henley is a registered Democrat who (based upon an unauthenticated Internet printout) has given money to Democratic politicians over the years (in addition to a number of Republicans, a fact overlooked by Defendants). (Henley Decl. ¶ 23; Henley Supp. Decl. ¶ 10.)"