Hershey,PA

[Glennsallnighter]

I don't think you are being a 'Downer' Soda, just a realist. I tend to agree. Given the boys reputation for their tight harmonies and the way the they tend to stick to a well known rigid routine, they might not be comfortable improvising. Also where would it stop. One song, 2 songs......could some people in the audiance get annoyed if THEIR song wasn't the one chosen?

I agree too that there are too many people out there DYING to say that they are not as good or as strong vocally etc as they were. While WE know that such statements are utter C**P and the Eagles know that they have a very strong fanbase, I guess they do not want to invite criticism either! JMO!

[Freypower]

Perhaps not, but I don't see how it could hurt them to have other songs rehearsed that they could just slot in just for a change of mood. Most other acts do this. I don't see why the Eagles can't. For instance there are other tracks from LROOE that are apparently never going to be played live, and I think that is a huge shame.

[Prettymaid]

Perhaps not, but I don't see how it could hurt them to have other songs rehearsed that they could just slot in just for a change of mood. Most other acts do this. I don't see why the Eagles can't. For instance there are other tracks from LROOE that are apparently never going to be played live, and I think that is a huge shame.

Aw, cmon FP, think positive. There's always the next tour!

[eaglesvet]

I don't think you are being a 'Downer' Soda, just a realist. I tend to agree. Given the boys reputation for their tight harmonies and the way the they tend to stick to a well known rigid routine, they might not be comfortable improvising. Also where would it stop. One song, 2 songs......could some people in the audiance get annoyed if THEIR song wasn't the one chosen?

I agree too that there are too many people out there DYING to say that they are not as good or as strong vocally etc as they were. While WE know that such statements are utter C**P and the Eagles know that they have a very strong fanbase, I guess they do not want to invite criticism either! JMO!

I think that for the aforementioned reasons, the most they would consider playing might be one song. I can't see an Eagles fan getting annoyed at hearing any extra song on top of the standard set list...what a treat!! I wouldn't care if it were Jingle Bells!

[Freypower]

The point is, as others have said, that it isn't going to happen. The setlist (which Glenn compiles, by the way) is as rigid as stone.

[Ive always been a dreamer]

The point is, as others have said, that it isn't going to happen. The setlist (which Glenn compiles, by the way) is as rigid as stone.

Well - quite honestly I doubt that it would probably ever happen, either. However, I never say never. If nothing else, the guys can also be very unpredictable. Who's to say that as they come nearer and nearer to the end of the band's touring days that they won't pull a few surprises. I definitely don't agree that the setlist is as rigid as stone.

[eaglesvet]

...sigh...a girl can only dream...

[Freypower]

It isn't rigid in the sense that songs from the new album have been added and they have apparently swapped OOTN and WW. It is rigid in the sense that it will now never be changed until the band breaks up. I don't wish to sound cynical but until I see any hint of a surprise, what else can I do.

[Ive always been a dreamer]

It is rigid in the sense that it will now never be changed until the band breaks up.

Sorry, but I don't agree with this at all. While I don't expect a major overhaul, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see some minor changes made.

[Freypower]

Some songs have been dropped to accommodate the new songs. Which songs do you think could be added?